A survey was put out asking Queens College students various questions about the seating selection here at QC.
The first question included if they are happy with our current seating selection? why or why not? The responses were diverse, with students expressing both positive and negative opinions. Some students were content with the seating, citing reasons such as accessibility, ease of finding a seat, or adequate space in classrooms. However, many students voiced dissatisfaction due to issues such as small desks, discomfort, lack of space, and difficulties in using laptops or other devices. Specific concerns included discomfort for larger individuals, small and unstable art stools, limited space between tables and chairs, and challenges for students with physical disabilities. Some students mentioned issues with the lecture hall seating, while others highlighted the inconvenience of uneven surfaces when tables were pushed together. Overall, the feedback suggests a range of experiences with seating across different classrooms and spaces at Queens College, with some students expressing a need for larger desks and improved comfort.
The second question asked students if they have ever experienced accessibility issues with QC’s seating before? The responses varied, with most of 17 students stating they had not encountered any accessibility issues. One person specifically mentioned that there were limited seats in some classes, while in others, there were too many seats. Some students acknowledged occasional challenges, with one person mentioning issues in the library or student union, and another noting the need to take chairs from other rooms due to a shortage. A few students expressed concerns about specific aspects, such as the tables attached to chairs or smaller desks that they felt were not suitable. In total, two students admitted to experiencing accessibility issues with QC’s seating arrangements. One student had problems with the tables attached to chairs but suggested a need for changes. Another student mentioned challenges specifically with smaller desks that seemed designed for preschoolers. The overall feedback suggests that while most students did not report accessibility issues, there were still some concerns raised by a small percentage of respondents, emphasizing the importance of considering diverse needs and preferences when it comes to seating options at Queens College.
The third question asked respondents if they believed Queens College would benefit from introducing new seating options. The overwhelming majority of respondents, 88.1% (37 people), expressed a positive stance, indicating that they believed Queens College would indeed benefit from the introduction of new seating options. This suggests a widespread interest or perceived need for change in the existing seating arrangements. On the other hand, a small percentage, 4.8% (2 people), expressed a contrary opinion by stating that they did not believe new seating options were necessary. The reasons behind this viewpoint were not explicitly provided in the summary. There were also a few nuanced responses that hinted at conditions under which new seating options might be beneficial. One person mentioned that there are enough seats, while another suggested that the necessity of new seating options would depend on the specific types of options introduced. Additionally, one respondent highlighted the potential benefit for students who use wheelchairs, emphasizing the importance of considering accessibility needs, such as the availability of ramps. While some respondents provided more nuanced viewpoints based on particular needs or circumstances, the survey’s overall findings indicate that Queens College students strongly support the idea of adding new seating options.
The fourth question stated how they think we can improve and make seating more accessible for students with different body sizes, considering factors like comfort and inclusivity, to create a more welcoming environment at Queens College if answered yes and if not, then why not. Out of 42 responses, 34 students expressed a positive view, suggesting that new seating options would indeed be beneficial. Students who answered affirmatively provided various suggestions for improvement, focusing on factors such as comfort, inclusivity, and accessibility for individuals with different body sizes. Common themes included the need for more variety, additional seating in the library and student union, considering the high demand during free hours, accessibility for students with disabilities, comfortable cushions, flexible and spacious seating, consideration for different body types, and adjustable features. Students recommended adjustable seats, chairs with back support, and having an equal number of left-handed and right-handed desks. The idea of introducing different seating options, such as sofas or modular seating, was mentioned to cater to different preferences and body types and movable and disconnectable seating from desks was mentioned to provide more room if needed. Some students emphasized the importance of having enough space for personal items like bags and coats. A small percentage of respondents answered negatively, with reasons not explicitly provided. One student mentioned that allowing students to manage seating themselves is sufficient, while another suggested that implementing a system would complicate matters. In summary, the survey results indicate a strong consensus among students in favor of introducing new seating options at Queens College The feedback highlighted the importance of creating an environment that puts comfort, productivity, and inclusivity for all students.
